Statistical significance and statistical power in hypothesis testing
Open Access
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- invited opinion
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 8 (2) , 304-309
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100080221
Abstract
Experimental design requires estimation of the sample size required to produce a meaningful conclusion. Often, experimental results are performed with sample sizes which are inappropriate to adequately support the conclusions made. In this paper, two factors which are involved in sample size estimation are detailed—namely type I (α) and type II (β) error. Type I error can be considered a “false positive” result while type II error can be considered a “false negative” result. Obviously, both types of error should be avoided. The choice of values for α and β is based on an investigator's understanding of the experimental system, not on arbitrary statistical rules. Examples relating to the choice of α and β are presented, along with a series of suggestions for use in experimental design.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1989
- On the comparison of effects.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- Beyond the confidence interval.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- Statistical criteria in the interpretation of epidemiologic data.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978