Progress and Deficiencies in the Registration of Clinical Trials
Open Access
- 19 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 360 (8) , 824-830
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr0806582
Abstract
Clinical trials are essential to understanding the efficacy of medical interventions. The ethical underpinnings of this type of research involving human subjects, codified in the Belmont Report1 and the Declaration of Helsinki,2 require that the results be publicly available to inform medical practice as well as future research. In addition, basic principles of evidence-based practice require the analysis of all data on a given topic; the practice of publishing only some results, but not others,3,4 undermines our collective ability to make rational decisions about medical care.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- An untold story?BMJ, 2008
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Clinical Trial Registration — Looking Back and Moving AheadNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular CausesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- FDA Responds to Institute of Medicine Drug Safety Recommendations—In PartPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2007
- Essie: A Concept-based Search Engine for Structured Biomedical TextJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2007
- Confidentiality Laws And Secrecy In Medical Research: Improving Public Access To Data On Drug SafetyHealth Affairs, 2007
- A Taxpayer-Funded Clinical Trials Registry and Results DatabasePLoS Medicine, 2004