Comparison of optical and radar measurements of surf and swash zone velocity fields
Open Access
- 28 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Vol. 108 (C3)
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jc001483
Abstract
Surf zone bore celerities and swash zone surface currents were measured on a shallow sloping, low‐energy beach using two remote sensing methods that differ fundamentally in their imaging mechanisms. Microwave Doppler radar measures electromagnetic backscatter from small‐scale ocean surface roughness while video‐based particle image velocimetry (PIV) relies on image texture resulting from variations in light reflectivity from the ocean surface. Imagery from the two methods showed high correlation, in which regions of high radar backscatter corresponded to visibly identifiable waves and bores propagating across the surf zone. Correlation coefficients between radial velocity time series sampled using the two methods at multiple locations across the surf zone were typically greater than 0.5 for frequencies less than a noise cutoff of 0.25 Hz. Similarly, spectra were found to be coherent at the 95% level with a nearly zero phase shift between the two signals near the broad spectral peak between 0.02 and 0.25 Hz. However, some significant differences were evident. PIV was capable of estimating both cross‐shore and alongshore surface velocities while the use of one microwave Doppler radar system restricted surface velocity estimates from that technique to line of sight (radial) only. PIV was found to be more capable of estimating swash zone (uprush and backwash) surface velocities as a smoother water surface in the swash zone adversely affected radar reflectivity. In contrast, microwave Doppler radar was found to be more capable of estimating the surface velocity between bores when insufficient image texture was recorded in the video imagery. Both techniques were capable of measuring surf zone bore celerities through comparison to a shallow water model and to independent celerity estimates extracted from the slope of individual bore trajectories. Typical normalized errors were roughly 25% for radar and 15% for PIV.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Water depth and surface current retrievals from airborne optical measurements of surface gravity wave dispersionJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2001
- Airborne Optical System for Remote Sensing of Ocean WavesJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2001
- Shallow water bathymetry derived from an analysis of X-band marine radar images of wavesCoastal Engineering, 1999
- Velocity, acceleration and vorticity under a breaking wavePhysics of Fluids, 1998
- Ocean surface features and currents measured with synthetic aperture radar interferometry and HF radarJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1996
- Observed wavenumber‐frequency properties of microwave backscatter from the ocean surface at near‐grazing anglesJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1996
- Ocean wave dispersion surface measured with airborne IR imaging systemIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996
- Directional ocean wave measurements in a coastal setting using a focused array imaging radarIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1995
- The Application of Video Image Processing to the Study of Nearshore ProcessesOceanography, 1993
- The application of particle image velocimetry to the study of water wavesOptics and Lasers in Engineering, 1988