How Investors Interpret Past Fund Returns
- 11 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 58 (5) , 2033-2058
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00596
Abstract
The literature documents a convex relation between past returns and fund flows of mutual funds. We show this to be consistent with fund incentives, because funds discard exactly those strategies which underperform. Past returns tell less about the future performance of funds which discard, so flows are less sensitive to them when they are poor. Our model predicts that strategy changes only occur after bad performance, and that bad performers who change strategy have dollar flow and future performance that are less sensitive to current performance than those that do not. Empirical tests support both predictions.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mutual Fund SurvivorshipThe Review of Financial Studies, 2002
- On Mutual Fund Investment StylesThe Review of Financial Studies, 2002
- Demand Curves and the Pricing of Money ManagementThe Review of Financial Studies, 2002
- Survivorship bias and attrition effects in measures of performance persistenceJournal of Financial Economics, 1999
- Volatility Timing in Mutual Funds: Evidence from Daily ReturnsThe Review of Financial Studies, 1999
- Career Concerns of Mutual Fund ManagersThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- Does It All Add Up? Benchmarks and the Compensation of Active Portfolio ManagersThe Journal of Business, 1997
- On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund IndustryThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Performance PersistenceThe Journal of Finance, 1995