Are We Undertreating Rectal Cancer in the Elderly?
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 246 (2) , 215-221
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318070838f
Abstract
Objective: To better understand the reasons for decreased survival rates in elderly patients with rectal cancer by performing an epidemiologic evaluation of age-related differences in treatment and survival. Summary Background Data: The incidence of rectal cancer increases with older age, and localized disease can be curatively treated with stage-appropriate radical surgery. However, older patients have been noted to experience decreased survival. Methods: Patients with localized rectal adenocarcinoma were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1991–2002). Cancer-specific survival by age, sex, surgery type, tumor grade, lymph node status, and use of radiation therapy was evaluated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results: We identified 21,390 patients who met the selection criteria. The median age was 68 years. Each half-decade increase in age ≥70 years was associated with a 37% increase in the relative risk (RR) for cancer-related mortality (RR = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–1.42); decreased receipt of cancer-directed surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36–0.63); more local excision and less radical surgery (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72–0.81); less radiotherapy (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61–0.67); and greater likelihood of N0 pathologic stage classification (OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05–1.15) (P < 0.0001 for each factor). The effect of age on cancer-specific mortality persisted in multivariate analysis with each half-decade increase in age ≥70 years resulting in a 31% increase in cancer-specific mortality (RR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.25–1.36; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: In elderly patients, rectal cancer is characterized by decreased cancer-related survival rates that are associated with less aggressive treatment overall and decreased disease stages at presentation. Investigation into the reasons for these treatment differences may help to define interventions to improve cancer outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2006CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2006
- Age and Colorectal Cancer With Focus on the Elderly: Trends in Relative Survival and Initial Treatment From a Danish Population-Based StudyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2005
- Co-morbidity leads to altered treatment and worse survival of elderly patients with colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- The management of rectal cancer in the elderlySurgical Oncology, 2004
- Cancer-Directed Surgery for Localized Disease: Decreased Use in the ElderlyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2004
- Assessment of outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in the elderly as a rationale for screening and early detectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Colon and rectal cancer in the elderly.Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2003
- A Pooled Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colon Cancer in Elderly PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Relative survival in elderly European cancer patients: evidence for health care inequalitiesCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2000
- Is local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer?Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000