Quantitative Clay Petrology: The Trees but Not the Forest?
- 1 December 1974
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Clays and Clay Minerals
- Vol. 22 (5-6) , 375-378
- https://doi.org/10.1346/ccmn.1974.0220502
Abstract
Gravitational settling and centrifuge techniques have been criticized in the preparation of X-ray specimen mounts for quantitative clay petrology because of the marked mineral segregations that can occur. Although the same factors can operate to produce error in the separation of the traditional less-than-2-μm fraction, this potentially more important source of bias is seldom taken into consideration. A fair representation of the bulk sample deserves at least as much attention as a representative X-ray mount. The most accurate and precise X-ray analyses may be geologically misleading or meaningless otherwise and translate as exercises in precision for its own sake.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Burial Diagenesis in Gulf Coast Pelitic SedimentsClays and Clay Minerals, 1970
- Clay mineral mounting techniques for X-ray diffraction analysis; a discussionJournal of Sedimentary Research, 1968
- Variations in clay mineralogy across facies boundaries in the Middle Devonian (Ludlowville) New YorkAmerican Journal of Science, 1963
- K-AR DATING OF SEDIMENTARY ILLITE POLYTYPESGSA Bulletin, 1962