The significance of using different methods for analysing photokeratoscopic data

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
With the photokeratoscope of Wesley‐Jessen, 45 pictures were taken from the right eye of 18 normal persons and analysed by 2 different methods. The first method is based on the assumption that radius of the corneal curvature is constant between 2 points of reflection, the second method is without such a preliminary assumption on the corneal contour. The parameters estimated: radius of the central curvature (K) and the coefficient of radius variation (RV) are compared. A difference in K at 1.5% corresponding in case to 0.6 diopters and a difference in RV at 46% are demonstrated. The differences are correlated to the error introduced by the assumption on constant radius. Further it is established that K measured by the keratometer of Javal‐Schiøtz is about 0.14 mm larger (in case 0.7 diopters) than K estimated by the method of photokeratoscopic data analysis without preliminary assumption.