Pig housing and human health
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in BSAP Occasional Publication
- Vol. 11, 41-51
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263967x00001749
Abstract
Studies in the USA, Sweden and the Netherlands have shown that workers in enclosed piggeries have high levels of respiratory injury, apparently caused or exacerbated by inhaled factors in their working environment. Three types of airborne hazard are known in piggeries — gases, dusts and infectious agents such as bacteria. Of the gases that accumulate in enclosed piggeries, carbon dioxide, methane and carbon monoxide, are asphyxiating, while dihydrogen sulphide and ammonia are irritant and toxic. The long-term effects of exposure to subclinical concentrations of these gases and their rôle in producing chronic respiratory effects in workers are unknown. Studies have shown that organic dusts occur in enclosed piggeries at undesirably high concentrations and that a relatively high proportion of this dust is respirable. The components of these dusts consist mostly of fractions of foodstuffs and pig faeces but with significant amounts of pigskin and pig gut epithelial cells. Also microbes, especially fungi and bacteria, have been found to be numerous. Different components of piggery dust could be irritant, toxic, allergenic, inflammatory or infectious, and a single component could have more than one of these effects. Studies suggest that bacterial endotoxins are present in the dust of enclosed piggeries at concentrations that could induce respiratory diseases in workers. It is recommended that in designing piggeries more attention should be given to the health and comfort of piggery workers and that a survey be carried out immediately to assess the level of respiratory disease in British piggery workers. Also a greater effort should be put into the health education of piggery workers and managers and of those involved in piggery design. Practical and effective systems for the control of dust and gas levels in piggeries, and appropriate management techniques, need to be developed for new piggeries and for already constructed buildings, and the financial cost of poor control of dust and gas contaminants brought home to producers. Overall, a watching brief needs to be maintained on trends in the design and management of pig rearing systems for their likely impact on workers' health.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characterization of dusts collected from swine confinement buildingsAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986
- Respiratory symptoms, lung function, and igg4 levels against pig antigens in a sample of dutch pig farmersAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986
- Hazardous agents in agricultural dusts and methods of evaluationAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986
- Prevention of dust exposureAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986
- Report on prevention and controlAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986
- The causes, detection, and control of respiratory dust diseases of farm workers in northern ScotlandAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986
- Chemical and physical-parameters of liquid manure from swine confinement facilities: Health implications for workers, swine and the environmentAgricultural Wastes, 1985
- Barn allergy among Scottish farmersClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1984
- A brief report of gram‐negative bacterial endotoxin levels in airborne and settled dusts in animal confinement buildingsAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1980
- Prevalence of Farmer's Lung in Scotland: A Pilot SurveyBMJ, 1972