Estimating numbers of birds by point counts: how long should counts last?
- 1 November 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Bird Study
- Vol. 31 (3) , 195-202
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00063658409476841
Abstract
The results of point counts using 5, 10, 15 and 20 min periods were compared from 6 habitats in England [UK]. Relationships between length of count and total numbers of birds and species recorded were curvilinear; > 50% were frequently recorded after 5 min., 70% after 10 min. and 87% after 15 min. Registration rates varied between species and some evidence suggested that these rates are of a characteristic form for each bird. Assessed community composition was very similar, whether based on the same number of 5, 10, 15 or 20 min. counts. Count duration had no significant influence on 2 simple measures of community structure. Counts exceeding 10 min. are wasteful of field effort which could be used to improve other aspects of sampling.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias in Density Estimates Due to Movement of BirdsOrnithological Applications, 1983
- Breeding Avifauna of a Mediterranean Succession: The Holm oak and Cork Oak Series in the Eastern Pyrenees, 1. Analysis and Modelling of the Structure GradientOikos, 1981
- A Variable Circular-Plot Method for Estimating Bird NumbersOrnithological Applications, 1980
- The Avifaunal Composition of Oregon White Oak StandsOrnithological Applications, 1970
- Ecological Distribution of Breeding Birds in the Upland Forests of Southern WisconsinEcological Monographs, 1957