Measuring the material base of the contemporary east‐west balance of power
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Interactions
- Vol. 15 (2) , 177-196
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03050627908434727
Abstract
There has been considerable progress in estimating the powerof nations, particularly with regard to the material capabilities upon which influence in conflictual situations depends. Two measures have dominated the field: the index of the Correlates of War (COW) project and gross national product (GNP). These indicators are consistent in the great majority of cases, but not for the United States and the Soviet Union after 1971. Gross national product seems more valid for this comparison primarily because the COW index no longer accurately measures industrialization and technological sophistication for the economically advanced countries. Consequently, the most important estimates of the U.S. and Soviet GNPs are surveyed in order to indicate the relative capabilities of the super powers. Some implications of the findings are considered.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The political dimension of national capabilities: Concepts and measurementInternational Interactions, 1988
- The evolution of power, threat, and security: Past and potential developmentsInternational Interactions, 1985
- War and Power Dynamics: Economic UnderpinningsInternational Studies Quarterly, 1983
- More Troops, Fewer MissilesForeign Policy, 1983
- Inflexible ResponseForeign Affairs, 1982
- War and the Cycle of Relative PowerAmerican Political Science Review, 1980
- NATO Defence and the soviet threatSurvival, 1979
- Soviet Computing and Technology Transfer: An OverviewWorld Politics, 1979
- Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old TendenciesWorld Politics, 1979
- Comparisons of United States and USSR National Output: Some Rules of the GameWorld Politics, 1960