The effects of Open and restricted context sentences and reasoning with conditional propositions
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 51 (3) , 243-252
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390198
Abstract
This study explores decoding and reasoning behavior with conditional propositions. The research confirms the major findings of prior research on conditional reasoning: Persons tend to make illicit conversions of conditionals to biconditionals, and have difficulty with Modus Tollens and contrapositive inferences. Most importantly, the research findings indicate that persons reason better when the stimulus material is generalized rather than specific and more context restricted.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretation of abstract conditional sentences in deductive reasoningJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973
- The Four-card Problem and the Generality of Formal ReasoningQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972
- Reasoning with conditional sentencesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971
- Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problemQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- A CONFLICT BETWEEN SELECTING AND EVALUATING INFORMATION IN AN INFERENTIAL TASKBritish Journal of Psychology, 1970
- REGRESSION IN REASONING?British Journal of Psychology, 1969
- How Implication Is UnderstoodThe American Journal of Psychology, 1969
- Proving a Disjunctive RuleQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Reasoning about a RuleQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- A METHOD FOR INVESTIGATING CHILDREN'S UNDERSTANDING OF CERTAIN LOGICAL CONNECTIVES USED IN BINARY PROPOSITIONAL THINKINGBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1967