Failure to detect ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae by standard disk susceptibility testing
- 1 August 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 30 (2) , 274-280
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.30.2.274
Abstract
We questioned whether the apparent rarity of ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing (NBLP) Haemophilus influenzae was due to failure of detection. We identified ampicillin-resistant and ampicillin-susceptible H. influenzae by the agar dilution technique, using 10(5)- and 10(3)-CFU inocula. We compared the disk susceptibility of 18 ampicillin-resistant NBLP strains, 13 ampicillin-resistant, beta-lactamase-producing strains, and 10 ampicillin-susceptible strains by using standard 10- and 2-micrograms ampicillin disks on two different media. We also investigated the possibility that disks containing 10 micrograms of clavulanic acid and 2 micrograms of ampicillin could be used to distinguish between the two ampicillin-resistant populations. Using the disk containing 2 micrograms of ampicillin, we correctly differentiated all the ampicillin-resistant isolates from the ampicillin-susceptible isolates on both media (a zone diameter of less than or equal to 15 mm was considered resistant). In contrast, the 10-micrograms ampicillin disk failed to detect 44% (8 of 18) of the ampicillin-resistant NBLP strains (a zone diameter of less than or equal to 19 mm was considered resistant). The MIC of ampicillin with the 10(3)-CFU inoculum correlated better with zone diameters than with the 10(5)-CFU inoculum. A difference in zone diameters of greater than or equal to 8 mm between the disk containing 10 micrograms of clavulanic acid and 2 micrograms of ampicillin and the disk containing only 2 micrograms of ampicillin correctly identified all beta-lactamase-producing strains. We conclude that the 2-micrograms ampicillin disk tests more readily identify ampicillin resistance in H. influenzae than do the 10-micrograms ampicillin disk tests. Future investigation should determine whether this in vitro resistance correlates with clinical treatment failures.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective randomized comparison of cefotaxime vs ampicillin and chloramphenicol for bacterial meningitis in childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1985
- AETIOLOGY OF PNEUMONIA IN CHILDREN IN GOROKA HOSPITAL, PAPUA NEW GUINEAThe Lancet, 1984
- Nontypable Haemophilus influenzae are Unencapsulated both in Vivo and in VitroThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1984
- Comparison of ceftriaxone with standard therapy for bacterial meningitisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1983
- Cefuroxime in bacterial meningitis.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1982
- Increase in antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae in the United Kingdom since 1977: report of study group.BMJ, 1982
- Haemophilus influenzae Infections in Adults: Characterization of Strains by Serotypes, Biotypes, and -Lactamase ProductionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1981
- MECHANISMS OF AMPICILLIN RESISTANCE IN HqMOPHILUS INFLUENZq FROM RESPIRATORY TRACTThe Lancet, 1980
- Emergence of Multiply Resistant PneumococciNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Kinetic studies on the inactivation of Escherichia coli RTEM β-lactamase by clavulanic acidBiochemistry, 1978