Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 77 (2) , 368-383
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1958922
Abstract
This article is a critique of contemporary pluralist theory as found largely in the work of Robert A. Dahl and Charles E. Lindblom. Two different forms of pluralism are distinguished and compared critically with Marxist class analysis. Pluralism, it is argued, fails to account for the reality of political and economic inequality in the United States. As a theory, pluralism is also marked by increasing tension between the underlying values and the performance of American polyarchy. The overall result is that pluralism's utility as a description and explanation of the American political economy is called into serious doubt, and a case is made for the explanatory superiority of class analysis.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Elite Integration in the United States and AustraliaAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- On Removing Certain Impediments to Democracy in the United StatesPolitical Science Quarterly, 1977
- Power: A Radical ViewPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- A Critique of the Elitist Theory of DemocracyAmerican Political Science Review, 1966
- Consensus and Ideology in American PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 1964
- Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical FrameworkAmerican Political Science Review, 1963
- The Decline and Fall of Social ClassThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1959
- A Critique of the Ruling Elite ModelAmerican Political Science Review, 1958
- The Process of GovernmentThe Western Political Quarterly, 1951
- Social Structure and the Ruling Class: Part 1British Journal of Sociology, 1950