Relationship between Intermittent Hydronephrosis and Megacalicosis
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 64 (2) , 125-129
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb05970.x
Abstract
Intermittent hydronephrosis is notoriously difficult to diagnose but, once confirmed, requires surgery. In contrast, congenital megacalicosis is accepted as a non-obstructive cause of upper urinary tract dilatation for which surgery is inappropriate. Experience with 2 cases and a review of the literature suggest that occasionally the clinical features and radiographic findings in the 2 conditions may overlap, leading to misdiagnosis. Attention to the combination of clinical features and radiography, together with the use of radionuclide techniques and acute pain studies, may help to distinguish between these conditions.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diuretic‐induced Urinary Flow Rates at Varying Clearances and their Relevance to the Performance and Interpretation of Diuresis RenographyBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Obstructive UropathyPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Intermittent Hydronephrosis: The Occult Ureteropelvic ObstructionJournal of Urology, 1983
- Megacalices—How Broad a Spectrum?British Journal of Urology, 1981
- Compensated Obstruction of the Renal PelvisBritish Journal of Urology, 1980
- Ureteropelvic Obstruction in Adults with Previously Normal Pyelograms: A Report of 5 CasesJournal of Urology, 1979
- Megacalicosis: A Burnt-Out Obstruction?Journal of Urology, 1973
- Congenital Megacalices versus Obstructive HydronephrosisJournal of Urology, 1972