Adaptation of mechanical properties of muscle to high force training in man.
- 1 August 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 365 (1) , 277-284
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015771
Abstract
The 1st dorsal interosseus muscle of the hand was trained for 8 wk using 80 maximal 10 s voluntary isometric contractions per day. As a result of this training the maximal voluntary force increased by 33% , but electrically evoked tetanic tension increased by only 11%. In other subjects the muscle was trained using electrical stimulation at 60 Hz to evoke 80 maximal 10 s tetani/day for 8 wk. This training produced no increase in maximum voluntary force. The increase in maximal voluntary force under these conditions may be due to a change in the voluntary neural drive to the muscle.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Isometric or dynamic training: differential effects on mechanical properties of a human muscleJournal of Applied Physiology, 1984
- Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loadsEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1984
- Isometric training in human elbow flexor muscles. The effects on voluntary and electrically evoked forces.1983
- Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man.The Journal of Physiology, 1981
- Effects of strength training and immobilization on human muscle fibresEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1980
- Effect of isometric strength training on mechanical, electrical, and metabolic aspects of muscle functionEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1978
- Isometric training of rats ? Effects upon fast and slow muscle and modification by an anabolic hormone (Nandrolone Decanoate)Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 1973
- A study on training effect on strength per unit cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurementEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1970
- The effect of repeated muscular exertion on muscle strengthThe Journal of Physiology, 1955