No Innate Phases in Group Problem Solving
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 8 (4) , 683-689
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284682
Abstract
A widely accepted empirical study (Bales & Strodtbeck, 1951)) concludes that “many staff conferences, committees, and similar groups” progress through predictable sequential phases in problem solving. Reexamination suggests that the conclusion is wrong. Only those subject groups that had never before met showed phased movement. The 1951 research may have measured the process of group formation, not problem solving. Well-acquainted small groups—for example, most management teams, task forces, and committees—do not naturally follow sequential phases in problem solving.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small GroupsSmall Group Behavior, 1980
- Time-Limited and Time-Extended Encounter GroupsSmall Group Behavior, 1979
- An Empirical Investigation of the Use of SimulationSmall Group Behavior, 1978
- Managerial Problem Solving Models: A Review and a ProposalAcademy of Management Review, 1978
- The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision ProcessesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1976
- Bales 20 Years LaterPersonality and Interpersonal Behavior. R. F. BalesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973
- Developmental sequence in small groups.Psychological Bulletin, 1965
- Developmental Trends in Small GroupsSociometry, 1959
- Developmental Trends in the Structure of Small GroupsSociometry, 1953
- Phases in group problem-solving.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951