The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 8 (9) , 851-858
- https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2002.35927
Abstract
In 1999, the Institute of Medicine suggested that instituting a continuous disease severity score that de-emphasizes waiting time could improve the allocation of cadaveric livers for transplantation. This report describes the development and initial implementation of this new plan. The goal was to develop a continuous disease severity scale that uses objective, readily available variables to predict mortality risk in patients with end-stage liver disease and reduce the emphasis on waiting time. Mechanisms were also developed for inclusion of good transplant candidates who do not have high risk of death but for whom transplantation may be urgent. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) scores were selected as the basis for the new allocation policy because of their high degree of accuracy for predicting death in patients having a variety of liver disease etiologies and across a broad spectrum of liver disease severity. Except for the most urgent patients, all patients will be ranked continuously under the new policy by their MELD/PELD score. Waiting time is used only to prioritize patients with identical MELD/PELD scores. Patients who are not well served by the MELD/PELD scores can be prioritized through a regionalized peer review system. This new liver allocation plan is based on more objective, verifiable measures of disease severity with minimal emphasis on waiting time. Application of such risk models provides an evidenced-based approach on which to base further refinements and improve the model.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting the probability of progression-free survival in patients with small hepatocellular carcinomaLiver Transplantation, 2002
- STUDIES OF PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION (SPLIT): YEAR 2000 OUTCOMESTransplantation, 2001
- Lamivudine Treatment Is Beneficial in Patients With Severely Decompensated Cirrhosis and Actively Replicating Hepatitis B Infection Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Comparative Study Using A Matched, Untreated CohortHepatology, 2001
- MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocationLiver Transplantation, 2001
- A Model to Predict Survival in Patients With End–Stage Liver DiseaseHepatology, 2001
- Surgical resection versus transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma: clues for the best strategyHepatology, 2000
- A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shuntsHepatology, 2000
- Primary liver resection and salvage transplantation or primary liver transplantation in patients with single, small hepatocellular carcinoma and preserved liver function: An outcome-oriented decision analysisHepatology, 2000
- Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: Resection versus transplantationHepatology, 1999
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982