Current Status of Prognostic Profiling in Breast Cancer
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 13 (4) , 350-360
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0216
Abstract
Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Assess emerging data on the use of genetic groupings of breast cancer as predictive factors, and examine the efficacy of different therapies aimed at optimizing outcomes of patients within these groups.Examine the clinical value of molecular diagnostic tests being developed to classify breast tumors, and discuss the challenges involved in validating and interpreting the results of these tests.Outline the potential uses of identifying and/or targeting breast cancer stem cells.Discuss the possible effect of genetic classification of breast tumors on the design of future clinical trials.CME Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ at CME.TheOncologist.comBreast cancer is a clinically heterogeneous disease that can affect individuals with seemingly identical clinicopathologic parameters differently. This clinical heterogeneity is driven to a large extent by abnormal gene expression within tumors. Investigators now have the ability to identify the gene-expression fingerprint of an individual's tumor. This information may be used to rationally design therapeutic targets in the future, and also to predict the clinical course of an individual's disease, including response to a specific treatment. Genetic profiles of tumors are now being correlated with clinical outcome, and several prognostic and predictive indicators have emerged based on this research. There are at least four commercially available predictive or prognostic tests, and several more are looming on the horizon. The data gathered from these tests augment standard diagnostic and prognostic information obtained from traditional clinical pathological variables. The advent of gene-profiling technologies started to change the conduct of clinical trials. In the not too distant future, prospective tissue collection for molecular analysis may become routine in order to stratify patients for treatment arms and to optimize treatment strategies based on molecular features of the cancer. Coordinated efforts among oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, laboratory scientists, statisticians, and regulators will be essential in the quest to incorporate genetic profiling and molecular hypotheses into clinical trial planning and conduct.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Taking gene-expression profiling to the clinic: when will molecular signatures become relevant to patient care?Nature Reviews Cancer, 2007
- HER2 expression and efficacy of preoperative paclitaxel/FAC chemotherapy in breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2007
- Molecular profiling in breast cancerReviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 2007
- Concordance among Gene-Expression–Based Predictors for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Estrogen-Receptor Status and Outcomes of Modern Chemotherapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast CancerJAMA, 2006
- A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Circulating Tumor Cells, Disease Progression, and Survival in Metastatic Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cellsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancerNature, 2002