Insulin Detemir Is Associated With More Predictable Glycemic Control and Reduced Risk of Hypoglycemia Than NPH Insulin in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on a Basal-Bolus Regimen With Premeal Insulin Aspart
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 26 (3) , 590-596
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.3.590
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Insulin detemir is a soluble basal insulin analog with a unique mechanism of protracted action designed to reduce the variability associated with conventional basal insulins. This trial compared the glycemic control, risk of hypoglycemia, and effect on body weight of insulin detemir and NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with rapid-acting insulin aspart at meals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This study was a 6-month multinational open parallel-group comparison conducted at 46 centers in five countries and included 448 patients with type 1 diabetes randomized 2:1 to insulin detemir or NPH insulin, respectively. RESULTS—After 6 months, comparable HbA1c levels were found between the two treatment groups. Fasting plasma glucose tended to be lower in patients treated with insulin detemir, but this difference was not statistically significant (−0.76 mmol/l, P = 0.097). Within-subject variation in self-measured fasting blood glucose was lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (SD 3.37 vs. 3.78 mmol/l, P < 0.001). Risk of hypoglycemia was 22% lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (P < 0.05) and 34% lower for nocturnal (2300–0600) hypoglycemia (P < 0.005). Nightly plasma glucose profiles were smoother and more stable with insulin detemir (P = 0.05). Body weight was significantly lower with insulin detemir at the end of the trial (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS—Treatment with insulin detemir resulted in more predictable glycemic control, with smoother plasma glucose profiles than NPH insulin and a significant reduction in the risk of hypoglycemia. The reduction in body weight with insulin detemir is a potential additional advantage. Regimens optimized for insulin detemir may be able to improve glycemic control beyond that possible with NPH insulin.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- New insulins in the treatment of diabetes mellitusBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2002
- Insulin aspart vs. human insulin in the management of long‐term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trialDiabetic Medicine, 2000
- Efficacy and safety of HOE 901 versus NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. The European Study Group of HOE 901 in type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Care, 2000
- Inadequate suspension of neutral protamine Hagendorn (NPH) insulin in pensThe Lancet, 1999
- World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjectsJAMA, 1997
- Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research GroupDiabetes, 1997
- Adverse Events and Their Association With Treatment Regimens in the Diabetes Control and Complications TrialDiabetes Care, 1995
- The Effect of Long-Term Intensified Insulin Treatment on the Development of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The Action Profiles of Human NPH Insulin PreparationsDiabetic Medicine, 1989
- Clinical Factors Influencing the Absorption of125I-NPH Insulin in Diabetic PatientsHormone and Metabolic Research, 1983