Apparent Motion in Depth Resulting from Changing Size and Changing Vergence
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 16 (3) , 337-350
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p160337
Abstract
Two experiments are reported in which the effect of combining stimuli of changing size and changing vergence on the perception of motion in depth was examined. Changing size and changing vergence corresponded to in-phase or anti-phase sinusoidal motions of an outline circle, with different amplitudes. In-phase stimuli had approximately additive effects on the estimated peak-to-peak amplitude of apparent motion in depth. Anti-phase stimuli did not cancel each other; apparent motion was in-phase with one or the other stimulus. When apparent motion was in-phase with one stimulus, there was only a limited influence of the other stimulus. The results are discussed with regard to a model proposed by Regan and Beverley for the combination of changing size and changing disparity.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansionPerception & Psychophysics, 1986
- Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motionPerception & Psychophysics, 1981
- Temporal selectivity of changing-size channelsJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1980
- Perception of depth: Processing of simple positional disparity as a function of viewing distancePerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979
- Looming detectors in the human visual pathwayVision Research, 1978
- Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depthPerception & Psychophysics, 1977
- Accuracy of eye position information for motor controlVision Research, 1977
- Visually perceived motion in depth resulting from proximal changes. IIPerception & Psychophysics, 1973
- Visually perceived motion in depth resulting from proximal changes. IPerception & Psychophysics, 1973