Problematic Publics: A Critical Review of Surveys of Public Attitudes to Biotechnology
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Vol. 22 (3) , 317-348
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200303
Abstract
This article discusses a range of recent major surveys of public attitudes toward biotechnology. The authors identify a number of problematic features of the surveys: the use of predominantly consumerist rather than civic conception of public discourse; the assumption of a unitary "general public," a "cognitive deficit" approach to public understanding of science; and the presumption of a politically neutral and instrumental ist model of science and technology. The authors then examine some alternative ap proaches to exploring perceptions of biotechnology among a diversity of interested publics, including more focused dialogical surveys, consensus conferences, and parlia mentary inquiries.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Manufacturing consensus?: Reflections on the UK national consensus conference on plant biotechnologyScience as Culture, 1995
- The information age and its new lexicon: Biotechnology as a case in pointTechnology in Society, 1994
- BST enters battle for consumersNature, 1994
- Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision MakingScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1993
- THE PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF RISKPrometheus, 1992
- Classical Democracy, Polls, and Public Opinion: Theoretical Frameworks for Studying the Development of Public SentimentCommunication Theory, 1991
- The evolution of the word 'biotechnology'Trends in Biotechnology, 1991
- Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional MechanismsScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1990
- The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of RiskScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1989
- POLITICS, POLICY MAKING AND PRESSURE GROUPS: SOME SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM OF THE AUSTRALIAN POLITICAL SYSTEMAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 1983