A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: the case of avoided deforestation
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Climate Policy
- Vol. 3 (2) , 123-136
- https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2003.0316
Abstract
One of the most challenging technical issues associated with project-based mechanisms is that of leakage. A conceptual framework is proposed for the identification and analysis of leakage potentially generated by a project. The categorization of leakage based on the actors responsible for their manifestation is proposed, which divides sources of leakage into primary and secondary types. It is the actors or agents responsible for the baseline activities that cause primary leakage. Secondary leakage occurs when the project's outputs create incentives for third parties to increase emissions elsewhere. This distinction, based on the source of leakage, provides a basis for the analysis outlined in the paper. The extent and type of leakage will vary depending on the project typology and design. Using a decision tree approach, the process of identifying potential sources of leakage is demonstrated for the case study of avoided deforestation projects. If the main elements determining a baseline are prope...Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: A case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in BoliviaMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2000
- Elements of a certification system for forestry-based carbon offset projectsMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2000
- Evaluating Carbon Offsets from Forestry and Energy Projects: How Do They Compare?Published by World Bank ,1999
- The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation?Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1998
- Modelling Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Tropical Land Use ChangeJournal of Biogeography, 1995