Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized
Top Cited Papers
- 17 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Neuroscience
- Vol. 6 (4) , 421-427
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1031
Abstract
Visually guided grasping movements require a rapid transformation of visual representations into object-specific motor programs. Here we report that graspable objects may facilitate these visuomotor transformations by automatically grabbing visual spatial attention. Human subjects viewed two task-irrelevant objects—one was a 'tool', the other a 'non-tool'—while waiting for a target to be presented in one of the two object locations. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we found that spatial attention was systematically drawn to tools in the right and lower visual fields, the hemifields that are dominant for visuomotor processing. Using event-related fMRI, we confirmed that tools grabbed spatial attention only when they also activated dorsal regions of premotor and prefrontal cortices, regions associated with visually guided actions and their planning. Although it is widely accepted that visual sensory gain aids perception, our results suggest that it may also have consequences for object-directed actions.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selectionNature Neuroscience, 2002
- Imaging the premotor areasCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 2001
- The Attentional Role of the Left Parietal Cortex: The Distinct Lateralization and Localization of Motor Attention in the Human BrainJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2001
- The Role of Familiar Size in the Control of GraspingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2001
- Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal StreamNeuroImage, 2000
- Evidence for visuomotor priming effectNeuroReport, 1996
- Neural correlates of category-specific knowledgeNature, 1996
- Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of ActionScience, 1995
- An Experimental Comparison of Stimulus Type, Display Type, and Input Variable Contributions to Visual Field AsymmetryBrain and Cognition, 1994