Death and End-of-Life Planning in One Midwestern Community
Open Access
- 23 February 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 158 (4) , 383-390
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.4.383
Abstract
DESPITE the great attention given to death and dying in the medical, ethical, and legal literature in the United States, an incomplete picture remains of end-of-life planning and decision making. It is reported that nearly 80% of deaths occur in health care organizations and more specifically that 60% of deaths occur in hospitals.1 The findings of SUPPORT (Study to Understand Prognosis and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments) provide a picture of the treatment of critically ill patients with limited prognosis, but it does not provide a picture of end-of-life planning and decision making for the general population.2 The findings of the La Crosse Advance Directive Study (LADS) reported herein provide a more comprehensive, detailed look at death, end-of-life planning, and forgoing medical treatment in a geographically defined population.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advance directives in Utah. Information from death certificates and informantsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- The use of living wills at the end of life. A national studyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Promoting inpatient directives about life-sustaining treatments in a community hospital. Results of a 3-year time-series intervention trialArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1995
- Prevalence of advance directives and do-not-resuscitate orders in community nursing facilitiesArchives of Family Medicine, 1994
- How well is the patient self-determination act working?: An early assessmentThe American Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The Utilization of the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care among Hospitalized Elderly PatientsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991
- Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991