Improved tumor targeting of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor Nanobodies through albumin binding: taking advantage of modular Nanobody technology
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Vol. 7 (8) , 2288-2297
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-07-2384
Abstract
The ∼15-kDa variable domains of camelid heavy-chain-only antibodies (called Nanobodies) can easily be formatted as multivalent or multispecific single-chain proteins. Because of fast excretion, however, they are less suitable for therapy of cancer. In this study, we aimed for improved tumor targeting of a bivalent anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Nanobody (αEGFR-αEGFR) by fusion to a Nanobody unit binding to albumin (αAlb). Biodistributions of αEGFR-αEGFR, αEGFR-αEGFR-αAlb (∼50 kDa), αTNF-αTNF-αAlb (control, binding tumor necrosis factor-α), and the ∼150-kDa anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab were compared in A431 xenograft-bearing mice. The proteins were radiolabeled with 177Lu to facilitate quantification. Tumor uptake of 177Lu-αEGFR-αEGFR decreased from 5.0 ± 1.4 to 1.1 ± 0.1 %ID/g between 6 and 72 h after injection. Due to its rapid blood clearance, tumor-to-blood ratios >80 were obtained within 6 h after injection. Blood clearance became dramatically slower and tumor uptake became significantly higher by introduction of αAlb. Blood levels of αEGFR-αEGFR-αAlb were 21.2 ± 2.5, 11.9 ± 0.6, and 4.0 ± 1.4 and tumor levels were 19.4 ± 5.5, 35.2 ± 7.5, and 28.0 ± 6.8 %ID/g at 6, 24, and 72 h after injection, respectively. Tumor uptake was at least as high as for cetuximab (15.5 ± 3.9, 27.1 ± 7.9, and 25.6 ± 6.1 %ID/g) and significantly higher than for αTNF-αTNF-αAlb. αEGFR-αEGFR-αAlb showed faster and deeper tumor penetration than cetuximab. These data show that simple fusion of αEGFR and αAlb building blocks results in a bifunctional Nanobody format, which seems more favorable for therapy as far as pharmacokinetics and tumor deposition are concerned. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(8):2288–97]Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facile radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies and other proteins with zirconium-89 or gallium-68 for PET imaging using p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamineProtocol Exchange, 2008
- MET Amplification Leads to Gefitinib Resistance in Lung Cancer by Activating ERBB3 SignalingScience, 2007
- Formatted anti–tumor necrosis factor α VHH proteins derived from camelids show superior potency and targeting to inflamed joints in a murine model of collagen‐induced arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 2006
- Potent antibody therapeutics by designNature Reviews Immunology, 2006
- Induced refolding of a temperature denatured llama heavy‐chain antibody fragment by its antigenProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2005
- Tumor targeting properties of monoclonal antibodies with different affinity for target antigen CD44V6 in nude mice bearing head‐and‐neck cancer xenograftsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2002
- Efficient tumor targeting by single‐domain antibody fragments of camelsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2002
- A facile method for the labeling of proteins with zirconium isotopesNuclear Medicine and Biology, 1996
- Immunoadhesins: principles and applicationsTrends in Biotechnology, 1996
- Consumption of EGF by A431 cells: evidence for receptor recycling.The Journal of cell biology, 1993