The Efficacy and Safety of Miglitol Therapy Compared With Glibenclamide in Patients With NIDDM Inadequately Controlled by Diet Alone
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 20 (5) , 687-691
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.5.687
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the therapeutic effects of the α-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol (BAY m 1099), the sulfonylurea glibenclamide, and placebo on parameters of metabolic control and safety in patients with NIDDM that is inadequately controlled by diet alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 201 patients in 18 centers in 4 countries were randomized in a double-blind manner to miglitol (50 mg t.i.d., followed by 100 mg t.i.d.), glibenclamide (3.5 mg q.d/b.i.d.), or placebo for 24 weeks. Efficacy criteria were changes from baseline of HbA1c, fasting and postprandial blood glucose and insulin levels, body weight, and serum triglycerides. RESULTS Efficacy was assessed in 119 patients who completed the full protocol, and the results were similar to those obtained in 186 patients who fulfilled the validity criteria for analysis. Compared with placebo, mean baseline-adjusted HbA1c decreased by 0.75% (P = 0.0021) and 1.01% (P = 0.0001) in the miglitol and glibenclamide treatment groups, respectively. Blood glucose decreased slightly in the fasting state and considerably in the postprandial state in both treatment groups but not in the placebo group. Fasting insulin levels increased slightly (NS) in all treatment groups; however, postprandial insulin levels decreased with miglitol, while increasing markedly with glibenclamide (P = 0.0001 between all treatment groups). Gastrointestinal side effects (flatulence and diarrhea) occurred mostly in the miglitol-treated patients, while some glibenclamide-treated patients had symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS Miglitol monotherapy is effective and safe in NIDDM patients. Compared with glibenclamide, it reduced HbA1c less effectively and caused more gastrointestinal side effects. On the other hand, glibenclamide, unlike miglitol, tended to cause hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and weight gain, which are not desirable in patients with NIDDM.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS) 13: relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three yearsBMJ, 1995
- NIDDM and its metabolic control predict coronary heart disease in elderly subjectsDiabetes, 1994
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial -- Implications for Policy and PracticeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The effect of miglitol and acarbose after an oral glucose load: a novel hypoglycaemic mechanism?British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1990
- Effects of 8-Wk α-Glucosidase Inhibition on Metabolic Control, C-Peptide Secretion, Hepatic Glucose Output, and Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity in Poorly Controlled Type II Diabetic PatientsDiabetes Care, 1989
- The Triumvirate: β-Cell, Muscle, Liver: A Collusion Responsible for NIDDMDiabetes, 1988
- Acarbose Monotherapy in the Treatment of Non-insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus — a ReviewPublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- Effect of 1-Desoxynojirimycin Derivatives on Small Intestinal Disaccharidase Activities and on Active Transport in vitroDigestion, 1985
- SUCROSE MALABSORPTION IN MAN AFTER INGESTION OF α-GLUCOSIDEHYDROLASE INHIBITORThe Lancet, 1978