Concepts Are Not a Natural Kind*
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 72 (3) , 444-467
- https://doi.org/10.1086/498473
Abstract
In cognitive psychology, concepts are those bodies of knowledge that are stored in long-term memory and are used by default in human beings’ higher cognitive processes (categorization, inductive and deductive reasoning, etc.). Most psychologists of concepts assume that these mental representations share many scientifically important properties, and the psychology of concepts is expected to describe those properties. Psychologists assume thereby thatconcepts constitute a natural kind. I call this assumption thenatural kind assumption. This article challenges the natural kind assumption. It is argued that a growing body of evidence suggests that concepts do not constitute a natural kind. Hence, the notion of concept is inappropriate, if one aims at formulating scientifically relevant inductive generalizations about the human mind.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The meaning of ‘meaning’Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2010
- The Big Book of ConceptsPublished by MIT Press ,2002
- Furnishing the MindPublished by MIT Press ,2002
- The role of similarity in natural categorizationPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2001
- ConceptsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1998
- What Emotions Really ArePublished by University of Chicago Press ,1997
- Similarity and decision makingPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Case-based PlanningPublished by Elsevier ,1989
- Categories and ConceptsPublished by Harvard University Press ,1981
- 5. Natural KindsPublished by Columbia University Press ,1969