Model-Based Prediction of Phase III Overall Survival in Colorectal Cancer on the Basis of Phase II Tumor Dynamics
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 27 (25) , 4103-4108
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.21.0807
Abstract
Purpose: We developed a drug-disease simulation model to predict antitumor response and overall survival in phase III studies from longitudinal tumor size data in phase II trials. Methods: We developed a longitudinal exposure-response tumor-growth inhibition (TGI) model of drug effect (and resistance) using phase II data of capecitabine (n = 34) and historical phase III data of fluorouracil (FU; n = 252) in colorectal cancer (CRC); and we developed a parametric survival model that related change in tumor size and patient characteristics to survival time using historical phase III data (n = 245). The models were validated in simulation of antitumor response and survival in an independent phase III study (n = 1,000 replicates) of capecitabine versus FU in CRC. Results: The TGI model provided a good fit of longitudinal tumor size data. A lognormal distribution best described the survival time, and baseline tumor size and change in tumor size from baseline at week 7 were predictors (P < .00001). Predicted change of tumor size and survival time distributions in the phase III study for both capecitabine and FU were consistent with observed values, for example, 431 days (90% prediction interval, 362 to 514 days) versus 401 days observed for survival in the capecitabine arm. A modest survival improvement of 39 days (90% prediction interval, −21 to 110 days) versus 35 days observed was predicted for capecitabine. Conclusion: The modeling framework successfully predicted survival in a phase III trial on the basis of capecitabine phase II data in CRC. It is a useful tool to support end-of-phase II decisions and design of phase III studies.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Success in Phase III Studies From Phase II Results: A New Paradigm Is NeededJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Systematic Survey of Therapeutic Trials for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Room for Improvement in the Critical PathwayJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Review of Phase II Trial Designs Used in Studies of Molecular Targeted Agents: Outcomes and Predictors of Success in Phase IIIJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Recommended changes to oncology clinical trial design: Revolution or evolution?European Journal Of Cancer, 2008
- Design of Phase II Cancer Trials Using a Continuous Endpoint of Change in Tumor Size: Application to a Study of Sorafenib and Erlotinib in Non Small-Cell Lung CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Objective Responses in Patients with Malignant Melanoma or Renal Cell Cancer in Early Clinical Studies Do Not Predict Regulatory ApprovalClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- Phase II Oncology Trials: Let's Be PositiveClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- Comparison of Oral Capecitabine Versus Intravenous Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin as First-Line Treatment in 605 Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase III StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Optimizing Drug Regimens in Cancer Chemotherapy by an Efficacy–Toxicity Mathematical ModelComputers and Biomedical Research, 2000
- Capecitabine, an Oral Fluoropyrimidine Carbamate With Substantial Activity in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase II StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000