The Lower Palaeozoic palaeogeographical evolution of the northeastern and eastern peri-Gondwanan margin from Turkey to New Zealand
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Geological Society of London in Geological Society, London, Special Publications
- Vol. 325 (1) , 3-21
- https://doi.org/10.1144/sp325.2
Abstract
In Lower Palaeozoic times, Gondwana was by far the largest tectonic entity, stretching from the South Pole to north of the Equator, and is termed a superterrane. We consider the northeastern sector of the Gondwanan and peri-Gondwanan margin, from Turkey through the Middle East, the north of the Indian subcontinent, southern China and SE Asia, to Australia and New Zealand. There was progressive tectonic activity along some of its margins during the period, with areas such as southeastern Australia undergoing enlargement through the accretion of island arcs as that part of Gondwana rotated. However, most of the area, from the Taurides of Turkey to at least east of India, represented a passive margin for the whole of the Lower Palaeozoic. Other adjacent areas, such as the Pontides of Turkey and Annamia (Indochina), were separate from the main Gondwanan craton as independent terranes. The quality and quantity of available data on Lower Palaeozoic rocks and faunas varies enormously over different parts of this substantial area, and there are few or no detailed palaeomagnetic data available for most of it. Some workers have considered the string of terranes from Armorica to the Malaysia Peninsula as having left Gondwana together in the late Cambrian as a Hun superterrane, leaving a widening Palaeotethys Ocean between it and Gondwana. However, we consider that the Palaeotethys opened no earlier than in late Silurian time (with Armorica and other terranes to its north), and that the Hun superterrane was not a cohesive unity. Other researchers vary in presenting many substantial Central Asian and Far Eastern terranes, including North China, South China, Tarim, Annamia and others, as integral parts of core Gondwana and not leaving it until Devonian and later times. We conclude that North China, Tarim and Annamia, among others, were probably not attached to core Gondwana in the Lower Palaeozoic, that South China was close to Gondwana (but not an integral part of it), and that Sibumasu was probably part of Gondwana. We try to reconcile the very varied published geological data and opinions, and present new palaeogeographical maps for that sector of Gondwana and surrounding areas for the Cambrian (500 Ma), Ordovician (480 Ma) and Silurian (425 Ma).This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global plate motion frames: Toward a unified modelReviews of Geophysics, 2008
- A long connection (750–380 Ma) between South China and Australia: paleomagnetic constraintsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Paleomagnetic results from the Silurian of the Yangtze paraplatformPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- A synopsis of events related to the assembly of eastern GondwanaTectonophysics, 2003
- Organization of pre-Variscan basement areas at the north-Gondwanan marginInternational Journal of Earth Sciences, 2001
- Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy and palaeontology, Karadere–Zirze area, Pontus Mountains, northern TurkeyGeological Magazine, 2000
- The Cambrian arc complex of the Takaka Terrane, New Zealand: An integrated stratigraphical, paleontological and geochemical approachNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1999
- The Karakorum Block in Central Asia, from Ordovician to CretaceousSedimentary Geology, 1997
- Tectonic implications of Late Proterozoic-Early Palaeozoic igneous rock associations in western TasmaniaTectonophysics, 1992
- Ordovician paleomagnetism of eastern Yunnan, ChinaGeophysical Research Letters, 1990