Infusion Thrombophlebitis: A Prospective Comparison of 645 Vialon® and Teflon® Cannulae in Anaesthetic and Postoperative Use
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
- Vol. 16 (3) , 265-271
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x8801600305
Abstract
A prospective study of the incidence and severity of infusion thrombophlebitis in peripheral intravenous infusions used for anaesthetic and postoperative purposes in 645 patients was conducted over a four-month period. Conditions of insertion were carefully controlled while ward management was according to standard practice. A total of 330 polyurethane Vialon® and 315 FEP-A Teflon® cannulae were used. The results show that the nature of the cannula was the single most important factor in the incidence and severity of infusion thrombophlebitis, Vialon® cannulae being associated with a 46% lower incidence than the Teflon® type. Less important but significant factors included intravenous antibiotics, duration of infusion, cannula tip damage and caesarean section. Factors not associated with infusion thrombophlebitis included potassium therapy, blood transfusion or site of insertion in the upper limb. Heparinisation increased duration of infusion without affecting the incidence of infusion thrombophlebitis.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- An in vivo method for the evaluation of catheter thrombogenicityJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1987
- INFUSION THROMBOPHLEBITISBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- Hazards of peripheral intravenous linesThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1984
- Preventing Infection in Intravenous TherapyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1977
- Venous reactions related to in-dwelling plastic cannulae: a prospective clinical trialCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 1976
- Thrombophlebitis and Pulmonary Embolism as Complications of PregnancyMedical Clinics of North America, 1974