Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 87 (4) , 1683-1694
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399416
Abstract
These experiments on across-channel masking (ACM) and comodulation masking release (CMR) were designed to extent the work of Grose and Hall [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1276-1284 (1989)] on CMR. They investigated the effect of the temporal position of a brief 700-Hz signal relative to the modulation cycle of a 700-Hz masker 100% sinusoidially amplitude modulated (SAM) at a 10-Hz rate, which was either presented alone (reference masker) or formed part of a masker consisting of the 3rd to 11th harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental. In the harmonic maskers, each harmonic was either SAM with the same 10-Hz modulaaltor phase (comodulated masker) or with a shift in modulator phase of 90.degree. for each successive harmonic (phase-incoherent masker). When the signal was presented at the dips of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, the comodulated masker gave lower thresholds than the reference masker, while the phase-incoherent masker gave higher thresholds, i.e., a CMR was observed. No CMR was found when the signal was presented at the peaks of the envelope. In experiment 1, we replicated the experiment of Grose and Hall, but with an additional condition in which the 600- and 800-Hz components were removed from the marker, in order to investigate the role of within-channel masking effects. The results were similar to those of Grose and Hall. In experiment 2, the signal was added at the peaks of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, but in antiphase to the carrier of that component and at a level chosen to transform the peaks into dips. No CMR was found. Rather, performance was worse for both the comodulated and phase-incoherent maskers than for the reference masker. This was true even when the flanking components in the maskers were all remote in frequency from 700 Hz. In experiment 3, the masker components were all 50% SAM and the signal was added in antiphase at a dip of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, thus making the dip deeper. Preformance was worse for the phase-incoherent than for the reference masker and was worse still for the comodulated masker. The results of all three experiments indicate strong ACM effects. CMR was found only when the signal was placed in the dips of the masker envelope and when it produced an increase in level relative to that in adjacent bands.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comodulation masking release (CMR): Effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking bandThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- Monaural envelope correlation perceptionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signalsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- The effect of cross-spectrum correlation on the detectability of a noise bandThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuationsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985
- Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tonesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985
- Temporal interactions between pure tones and amplitude-modulated noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985
- Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patternsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1983
- Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation levelThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977