False Equivalency: Think Tank References on Education in the News Media
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Peabody Journal of Education
- Vol. 82 (1) , 63-102
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560709336537
Abstract
This study explores the use and presentation of information and research on education by the news media. Using content analysis, this study compares four types of think tanks—contract research, academic, advocacy, and mixed academic and advocacy—and shows how the news media represented each one as a source of research, facts, and figures on education. The findings from this study show that the news media presented all the think tanks as credible sources of research, facts, and figures on education, regardless of the extent to which each think tank emphasized policy and political advocacy over the professional norms of academic research.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- How the Media Compound Urban ProblemsJournal of Urban Affairs, 2005
- The Political Activity of Think Tanks: The Case for Mandatory Contributor DisclosureHarvard Law Review, 2002
- Media (Mis)Representations of Education in the 2000 Presidential ElectionEducational Policy, 2002
- Think Tanks in the U.S. MediaThe International Journal of Press/Politics, 2000
- Group Identification in Political ContextPolitical Psychology, 1994
- Ethical Standards of the American Educational Research AssociationEducational Researcher, 1992
- A Question of Accuracy: How Journalists and Scientists Report Research on HazardsJournal of Communication, 1990
- A Question of Quality: How Journalists and News Sources Evaluate Coverage of Environmental RiskJournal of Communication, 1990
- The Changing World of Think TanksPS: Political Science and Politics, 1989
- Scientific Freedom and ResponsibilityScience, 1975