Age, Cohort, and Time-Period Confounds in Aging Research
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Journal of Gerontological Nursing
- Vol. 15 (3) , 11-15
- https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-19890301-05
Abstract
1. Cross-sectional studies of age-related changes or developmental patterns contain the inherent confound of age and cohort. 2. Longitudinal studies of age-related changes or developmental patterns contain the inherent confound of age and time-period. 3. Many complex research designs and decision rules have been developed in an attempt to disentangle these confounds. These designs and decision rules are only useful if their assumptions are met. 4. It is important to logically determine when the age, cohort, and time-period confounds discussed in this article are important to resolve in a nursing study and when the confounds do not directly relate to the clinical or theoretical merit of a study.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aging as intracohort differentiation: Accentuation, the Matthew effect, and the life courseSociological Forum, 1987
- THE REALITIES OF BODY IMAGEJournal of Gerontological Nursing, 1986
- Aging and BehaviorPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- An approach to the attribution of aging, period, and cohort effects.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- When Can Age, Period, and Cohort be Separated?Social Forces, 1978
- When Can Age, Period, and Cohort be Separated?Social Forces, 1978
- What Is a Cohort and Why?Human Development, 1978
- Sequential strategies and the separation of age, cohort, and time-of-measurement contributions to developmental data.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- A general model for the study of developmental problems.Psychological Bulletin, 1965