What Proportion of Incident Radiographic Vertebral Deformities Is Clinically Diagnosed and Vice Versa?
Open Access
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 20 (7) , 1216-1222
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.050314
Abstract
We prospectively examined, in a large cohort of older women, the proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities diagnosed as incident clinical vertebral fractures in the same women at the same vertebral level. The proportion of deformities clinically diagnosed ranged from n = 6084). Incident vertebral deformities were defined at a given vertebral level as a reduction between baseline and closeout radiographs of ≥20% and 4 mm in any vertebral height and subdivided into two severity categories. Incident clinical vertebral fractures were those reported to clinical centers by participants and confirmed by the study radiologist, who compared the community spinal radiograph with the participant's baseline study radiograph using semiquantitative methods. Results: A total of 446 incident radiographic vertebral deformities were identified in 330 women, whereas 121 women experienced one or more confirmed incident clinical vertebral fracture. Of incident radiograpic vertebral deformities, 22.6% were also clinically diagnosed as incident vertebral fractures, with clinical diagnoses made for 28.4% of the deformities that exceeded 30% and 4 mm height loss (severe deformity) compared with 14.3% for deformities that involved ≥20% and 4 mm but <30% height loss (milder deformity). Of incident clinical vertebral fractures, 72.7% were morphometrically identified as incident deformities, most of them as severe deformities. More than 20% of incident clinical fractures were not identified as incident deformities by even the most liberal morphometric criterion used in this study. Conclusions: Approximately one‐fourth of incident radiographic vertebral deformities were clinically diagnosed as new vertebral fractures, although the proportion clinically diagnosed was increased for more severe deformities. Whereas most incident clinical vertebral fractures were identified as severe morphometric deformities, approximately one‐fourth did not meet even the most liberal study criterion for morphometric deformity. Further study of factors that may explain the discordance between incident vertebral deformities and incident clinical vertebral fractures is important.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fractureOsteoporosis International, 2003
- The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation StudyArthritis & Rheumatism, 2001
- Risk of Mortality Following Clinical FracturesOsteoporosis International, 2000
- Vertebral Fractures Predict Subsequent FracturesOsteoporosis International, 1999
- The Association of Radiographically Detected Vertebral Fractures with Back Pain and Function: A Prospective StudyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative techniqueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1993
- Population-Based Study of Survival after Osteoporotic FracturesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- The assessment of vertebral deformity: A method for use in population studies and clinical trialsOsteoporosis International, 1993
- Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformitiesOsteoporosis International, 1993
- Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: A population-based study in rochester, minnesota, 1985-1989Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992