Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers
- 17 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Health Policy
- Vol. 61 (3) , 279-290
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00237-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Priority-setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative case studyThe Lancet, 2001
- The second phase of priority setting Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician's perspective on priority setting Israel's basic basket of health services: the importance of being explicitly implicitBMJ, 1998
- Allocating Livers — Devising a Fair SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Controlling the Costs of Health Care for the Elderly — Fair Means and FoulNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?BMJ, 1996
- The Concept of Equity in Health Services ResearchScandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1996
- Allocating Health Care: Cost-Utility Analysis, Informed Democratic Decision Making, or the Veil of Ignorance?Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1996
- Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationingBMJ, 1995
- Understanding Financial Conflicts of InterestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Dimensions of rationing: who should do what?BMJ, 1993