FIVE PITFALLS ENCOUNTERED WHILE TRYING TO COMPARE STATES ON THEIR SAT SCORES
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Educational Measurement
- Vol. 23 (1) , 69-81
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1986.tb00235.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The SAT as a Social Indicator: A Pretty Bad IdeaPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Discussion of "on State Education Statistics": A Difficulty with Regression Analyses of Regional Test Score AveragesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1985
- On "State Education Statistics"Journal of Educational Statistics, 1985
- Variations in State SAT Performance: Meaningful or Misleading?Harvard Educational Review, 1984
- Difficulties with Regression Analyses of Age-Adjusted RatesPublished by JSTOR ,1984
- The Consquences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable That Has Been Affected by the TreatmentJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1984
- Comparable Scores for the CEEB Scholastic Aptitude Test and the American College Test ProgramMeasurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1968
- Analysis of Covariance: Its Nature and UsesPublished by JSTOR ,1957