Comment on ‘‘Phase properties of the quantized single-mode electromagnetic field’’
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 43 (5) , 2576-2578
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.43.2576
Abstract
We show that the approach by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] to construct a phase operator through a limiting procedure does not give a satisfactory description of the phase properties of the quantized electromagnetic field. We refute the claim that their approach predicts the same results of physical experiments on phase properties as the conventional Hilbert space approach. Their procedure could only be used as a definition of the phase, but it is not a good definition because the ‘‘phase’’ states they used to construct their ‘‘phase’’ operator are not of precisely defined phase contrary to their assertion.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase properties of the quantized single-mode electromagnetic fieldPhysical Review A, 1989
- On the Hermitian Optical Phase OperatorJournal of Modern Optics, 1989
- Unitary Phase Operator in Quantum MechanicsEurophysics Letters, 1988
- Phase in quantum opticsJournal of Physics A: General Physics, 1986
- Phase and Angle Variables in Quantum MechanicsReviews of Modern Physics, 1968
- Quantum mechanical phase and time operatorPhysics Physique Fizika, 1964
- Amplitude and phase uncertainty relationsPhysics Letters, 1963
- Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation FieldPhysical Review B, 1963
- The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiationProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 1927