A systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Are breast cancer patients better of with a high volume provider?

This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:

• Volume‐ or outcome‐based referral to improve quality of care for esophageal cancer surgery in The Netherlands
  Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2009
• Directing Surgical Quality Improvement Initiatives: Comparison of Perioperative Mortality and Long-Term Survival for Cancer Surgery
  Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
• Are Many Community Hospitals Undertreating Breast Cancer?
  Annals of Surgery, 2008
• High-Volume versus Low-Volume for Esophageal Resections for Cancer: The Essential Role of Case-Mix Adjustments based on Clinical Data
  Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007
• Hospital Volume and Late Survival After Cancer Surgery
  Annals of Surgery, 2007
• Relationship Between Number of Breast Cancer Operations Performed and 5-Year Survival After Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
  American Journal of Public Health, 2007
• EUSOMA accreditation of breast units
  European Journal Of Cancer, 2006
• Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
  BMJ, 2003
• The Relation Between Surgical Volume and Mortality: An Exploration of Causal Factors and Alternative Models
  Medical Care, 1980
• Should Operations Be Regionalized?
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1979