Abstract
Shinkmah''s hypothesis that day-old chicks avoid the deep side of a visual cliff because the pattern is out-of-focus was tested by placing 12-24 hr. old chicks on a modified visual cliff with a choice between sharp in focus and blurred out-of-focus patterns placed directly under the glass, i.e., at equal distances from the chicks. Chicks showed no preference for sharp over blurred patterns, but did show the usual preference for a near pattern over a pattern at greater depth. Blurred and sharp patterns varied in a neardeep cliff did not produce evidence of blur avoidance. Results provide evidence against Shinkman''s focusing cue theory of cliff avoidance and favor motion parallax as the critical cue.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: