Retrievability of Uncoated Versus Paclitaxel-coated Günther-Tulip IVC Filters in an Animal Model
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
- Vol. 15 (7) , 719-726
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rvi.0000133512.20764.d8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Update on Inferior Vena Cava FiltersJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2003
- A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Animal Experience in the Gunther Tulip Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava FilterCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2001
- Günther Tulip Retrievable Vena Cava Filter: Results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology AssociationJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2001
- Paclitaxel-coated Gianturco–Roubin® II (GR®II) stents reduce neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary in-stent restenosis modelCoronary Artery Disease, 2001
- A Clinical Trial of Vena Caval Filters in the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Proximal Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- New device for wire and catheter capturing: In vivo experiments and first clinical experienceCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 1995
- A Retrievable Nitinol Vena Cava Filter: Experimental and Initial Clinical ResultsJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1994
- New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: Experimentalin vitro andin vivo evaluationCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 1993
- Experience with the Amplatz retrievable vena cava filter.Radiology, 1989