A Comparison of Danaparoid and Lepirudin in Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 85 (06) , 950-957
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1615946
Abstract
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a hypercoagulable syndrome strongly associated with thrombosis that is usually treated with drugs that inhibit factor Xa (danaparoid) or thrombin (lepirudin). In the present study the outcome of HIT-patients treated with danaparoid or lepirudin was compared using the single or combined endpoints of new thromboembolic complications (new TECs), amputations and/or death, and major bleeding. HIT-patients treated with lepirudin were enrolled in two prospective trials and patients, who were identified in the same two laboratories during the same time period, who were not enrolled into these studies but treated with danaparoid, were assessed retrospectively according to a standardized questionnaire. 126 danaparoid (60.3% female) and 175 lepirudin treated patients (58.3% female) fulfilled the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. In a time-to-eventanalysis the cumulative risk of combined endpoint was higher in HIT-patients without thromboembolic complication at baseline treated with danaparoid (usually in prophylactic dose 750 anti-factor Xa units b.i.d. or t.i.d. s.c.) as compared to lepirudin (aPTT adjusted) (P = 0.020). Whereas HIT-patients with TEC at baseline who were usually treated with therapeutic dose had a similar outcome in both treatment groups (P = 0.913). Major bleeding occurred in 2.5% (95% CI 0.5-7.0%) of danaparoid treated patients as compared to 10.4% (95% CI 6.3-15.9%) of lepirudin treated patients until day 42 (P = 0.009). This indicates that the efficacies of therapeutic doses of danaparoid or lepirudin in preventing death, amputation or new TEC in HIT-patients do not differ largely, but the risk of bleeding seems to be higher in lepirudin treated patients. The prophylactic dose of danaparoid approved in the European Union for HIT without TEC at baseline seems suboptimal. A prospective comparative trial is required to verify these preliminary conclusions.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Failure of early heparin cessation as treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopeniaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia: Towards ConsensusThrombosis and Haemostasis, 1998
- The Pathogenesis of Venous Limb Gangrene Associated with Heparin-Induced ThrombocytopeniaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- A 14-year study of heparin-induced thrombocytopeniaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Pathogenicity of IgA and/or IgM antibodies to heparin–PF4 complexes in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopeniaBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Treated with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin or Unfractionated HeparinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1994
- Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: mechanism of interaction of the heparin‐dependent antibody with plateletsBritish Journal of Haematology, 1989
- Immune Endothelial-Cell Injury in Heparin-Associated ThrombocytopeniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA: ASSOCIATION OF THROMBOTIC COMPLICATIONS WITH HEPARIN-DEPENDENT IgG ANTIBODY THAT INDUCES THROMBOXANE SYNTHESIS AND PLATELET AGGREGATIONThe Lancet, 1982