When and How Can Endpoints Be Changed after Initiation of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Open Access
- 13 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Clinical Trials
- Vol. 2 (4) , e18
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020018
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trialPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- The Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events (PROactive)Diabetes Care, 2004
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- On changing a long‐term clinical trial midstreamStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Journals should see original protocols for clinical trialsBMJ, 2001
- The Effect of Aggressive Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Low-Dose Anticoagulation on Obstructive Changes in Saphenous-Vein Coronary-Artery Bypass GraftsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Issues in the early termination of the aspirin component of the physicians' health studyAnnals of Epidemiology, 1991
- The preliminary report of the findings of the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. The FDA perspective on aspirin for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction.1988