A comparison of four distributions used in flood frequency analysis in Bangladesh
Open Access
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Vol. 40 (1) , 55-66
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669509491390
Abstract
This paper discusses how lognormal, Gumbel and log-Pearson type 3 distributions were eliminated as candidates for modelling at-site annual maximum discharge series in Bangladesh. Among candidate distributions, the generalized extreme value distribution best represented the statistical characteristics of observed data. Comparisons of distributions were based upon the root mean square deviation in fit, the probability plot correlation coefficient and L-moment ratio diagrams. The last method assesses whether a candidate distribution is capable of simulating the site-to-site variation in statistical characteristics that is present in observed flood samples.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Log-logistic flood frequency analysisPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysisWater Resources Research, 1993
- Statistical modelling of annual maximum flows in Turkish riversHydrological Sciences Journal, 1991
- Goodness‐of‐fit tests for regional generalized extreme value flood distributionsWater Resources Research, 1991
- Log Pearson III distribution — Is it applicable to flood frequency analysis of Australian streams?Journal of Hydrology, 1981
- Probability weighted moments compared with some traditional techniques in estimating Gumbel Parameters and quantilesWater Resources Research, 1979
- Probability weighted moments: Definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressable in inverse formWater Resources Research, 1979
- Unbiased plotting positions — A reviewJournal of Hydrology, 1978
- The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for NormalityTechnometrics, 1975
- Uniform Flood‐Frequency Estimating Methods for Federal AgenciesWater Resources Research, 1968