QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF METHODS OF ADMINISTERING PHYSOSTIGMINE
- 1 October 1943
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 30 (4) , 521-525
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1943.00880220113011
Abstract
Physostigmine, because of its potent parasympathomimetic action, has retained an important position in ophthalmic therapy since first used as a miotic by Laqueur (1876).1It is administered usually in an aqueous solution and less frequently in an ointment or lamella. The official preparation is physostigmine salicylate, although the sulfate, which possesses similar pharmacologic properties, is also available. This paper presents a comparison of the effectiveness of the various methods of local application, including iontophoresis and the use of a wetting agent. new method, its relative advantages and disadvantages must be carefully balanced. As part of the evaluation it is desirable to know the amount of drug entering the eye. Therefore a quantitative estimation was made of the physostigmine content of the aqueous humor of the rabbit's eye with different methods of application. No local or general deleterious effects were noted with any of the procedures described. A temporary cornealKeywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: