Evaluating Personalized Risk Messages
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 16 (3) , 235-246
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9201600302
Abstract
An experiment was conducted (N = 766) to compare three different strategies for delivering radon test results to homeowners. The three strategies examined were a form letter, a personalized letter, and a personalized letter with telephone follow-up. Evaluation criteria were recall of the action recommendation, compliance with the action recommendation, and satisfaction with the program that provided the test. The more ambitious strategies increased satisfaction with the program that provided the free tests, but did not affect recall of the action recommendation or compliance with the recommendation. Risk communication situations in which the extra effort required by personalization and telephone follow-ups may have greater benefits are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communicating Risks to the PublicPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sampleJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1987
- Psychology in Health Risk Messages for WorkersJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1985