The Coincidence of Student Evaluation by Professor and Peer Group Using Rank Correlation

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Many university level instructors believe that the system of evaluation and subsequent grading is equitable. The students on the other hand do not always share this belief. This author believes that given the same input, an evaluation of a student by the teacher or by his peer group would not be significantly different. In order to test this hypothesis, an experiment was conducted in a graduate case course during a summer session at Marquette University’s College of Business Administration. The purpose of this article is to describe the results supporting that hypothesis.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: