Advantages and Disadvantages of Current Diagnostic Tests for the Detection ofHelicobacter pylori
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 31 (sup215) , 57-62
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529609094536
Abstract
Current tests used to detect Helicobacter pylori are either invasive (histological detection, culture, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), smear examination) or non-invasive (serology, 13C-urea breath test). These tests vary in their sensitivity and specificity, and the choice of test will depend on the situation, for example, whether the test is to detect infection or the success of eradication treatment. The accuracy of histological tests depends, to a large degree, on the expertise of the pathologist, while the accuracy of culture can depend on the conditions in which the specimen is transported and processed. When performed under optimal conditions, both techniques give very good results. The PCR test has similar sensitivity and specificity to histological and culture tests but a strict protocol must be followed to avoid contamination with H. pylori DNA. The rapid urease test (with a reading taken 1 hour later) is suitable for diagnosis before treatment but its sensitivity decreases after treatment. Smear examination has limited sensitivity. The urea breath test and serology (specific IgG detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with purified antigens) have sensitivities close to those using the best of the biopsy methods. Other points to consider when selecting a test are its availability, the rapidity of the results (which can range from a few minutes to 2 weeks), possibilities for retrospective analysis, quantification and the detection of pathogenic properties, the globality of certain tests that present an overall picture of the stomach, thus avoiding errors in sampling, and the cost of the test. Important added value can be gained from certain tests: histology allows evaluation of the status of the mucosa, culture allows strain typing and tests for antibiotic susceptibility, and the breath test can confirm successful eradication without endoscopy. When the diagnostic tests are performed correctly, most of them are highly accurate.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection with 13C-urea breath testThe Lancet, 1995
- Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction for detecting the urease C gene of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy samples and dental plaqueJournal of Medical Microbiology, 1993
- Detection in an enzyme immunoassay of an immune response to a recombinant fragment of the 128 kilodalton protein (CagA) ofHelicobacter pyloriEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1993
- Diagnostic value of decreasing IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody titres after eradication of Helicobacter pyloriThe Lancet, 1992
- Observer Homogeneity in the Histologic Diagnosis ofHelicobacter pylori: Latent Class Analysis, Kappa Coefficient, and Repeat FrequencyScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1992
- The Sydney System: Histological divisionJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 1991
- Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy people: a dynamic process?Gut, 1991
- ONE-MINUTE ENDOSCOPY ROOM TEST FOR CAMPYLOBACTER PYLORIThe Lancet, 1988
- Evaluation of "CLO-test" to detect Campylobacter pyloridis in gastric mucosa.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1987
- MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES FOR RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF CAMPYLOBACTER PYLORIDISThe Lancet, 1986