New diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus
- 20 February 1999
- Vol. 318 (7182) , 531
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7182.531
Abstract
# New criteria result in fewer cases in older adults {#article-title-2} EDITOR—The DECODE Study Group's paper on the implications of the American Diabetes Association's (ADA) recent changes in diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus raises several issues.1 The World Health Organisation's definition of diabetes that was used in the American report included both fasting glucose concentrations and concentrations 2 hours after a glucose load.2 In the DECODE paper, however, WHO criteria were defined by theglucose concentration after challenge alone. This difference in definition of the WHO criteria may help to explain why changes in prevalence estimates of diabetes presented in the DECODE paper differ from findings in the American report. A reanalysis of data using consistent definitions would be desirable. More important questions stem from the DECODE Study Group's finding that the prevalence of diabetes in older adults will increase substantially with the ADA criteria. We believe that the opposite is likely to happen. Most people who have fasting glucose concentrations that are diagnostic ofdiabetes will also have high glucose concentrations after a glucose load. However, glucose intolerance is a common feature of advancing age and often exists in subjects without a high fasting glucose concentration. As the ADA criteria emphasise fasting glucose concentration over glucose intolerance, fewer older people are likely to be classed as having diabetes overall. We therefore agreethat the ADA criteria will potentially bias prevalence estimates of diabetes relevant to age, but these estimates will underestimate rather than overestimate the prevalence of diabetes in older adults. The question of whether raised glucose concentrations after a glucose load in the absence of a raised fasting glucose concentration should be considered to be diabetes has been controversial. Arecent study showed that isolated hyperglycaemia after challenge in women aged 50-89 with normal fasting glucose concentrations was associated with a 2.9-fold increase in risk of cardiovascular disease over 7 years …Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The changing classification and diagnosis of diabetesBMJ, 1998
- Isolated Postchallenge Hyperglycemia and the Risk of Fatal Cardiovascular Disease in Older Women and Men: The Rancho Bernardo StudyDiabetes Care, 1998
- Evaluation of the Use of Fasting Plasma Glucose as a New Diagnostic Criterion for Diabetes in Asian Indian PopulationDiabetes Care, 1998
- Comparison of Diabetes Diagnostic Categories in the U.S. Population According to 1997 American Diabetes Association and 1980–1985 World Health Organization Diagnostic CriteriaDiabetes Care, 1997
- Prevalence, detection, and management of cardiovascular risk factors in different ethnic groups in south LondonHeart, 1997
- Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 1997
- Revision of diagnostic criteria for diabetesThe Lancet, 1996
- Risk Factors for NIDDM in White Population: Paris Prospective StudyDiabetes, 1991