The Evolution of Dominance: Haldane v Fisher revisited
- 1 February 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Heredity
- Vol. 38 (1) , 117-119
- https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1977.13
Abstract
Fisher's model for the evolution of dominance indicates that the accumulation of dominance modifiers will be accelerated by (1) an increased frequency of the mutant heterozygote, (2) increased selection for the phenotype of the normal homozygote. The model has been criticised by Haldane on the grounds that point (1) is not fullfilled, that is dominance appears to be more common in populations with a low frequency of mutant heterozygotes (populations of inbreeders). In support of Fisher's model it is argued that intense selection for the wild type phenotype is more common in inbreeders than outbreeders. This situation should promote the accumulation of dominance modifiers (point (2) above).Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- CHIASMA FREQUENCY EVIDENCE ON THE EVOLUTION OF AUTOGAMY INLIMNANTHES FLOCCOSA(LIMNANTHACEAE)Evolution, 1973
- POPULATION STUDIES IN PREDOMINANTLY SELF-POLLINATED SPECIES. VIII. GENETIC VARIABILITY IN THE FESTUCA MICROSTACHYS COMPLEXEvolution, 1967
- Variation and evolution in South American ClarkiaHeredity, 1966
- Evidence for the Partial Dominance of Recessive Lethal Genes in Natural Populations of DrosophilaThe American Naturalist, 1964
- RAPID EVOLUTION IN CLARKIAEvolution, 1958
- Self Fertilization and Population Variability in the Higher PlantsThe American Naturalist, 1957
- The theory of the evolution of dominanceJournal of Genetics, 1939
- THE EVOLUTION OF DOMINANCEBiological Reviews, 1931
- The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent MutationsThe American Naturalist, 1928
- Notes on Cleistogamy of GrassesBotanical Gazette, 1908