Characterization of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases and their interaction with proteinase inhibitors using gel X‐ray film contact print technique
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- general subject
- Published by Wiley in Electrophoresis
- Vol. 19 (8-9) , 1397-1402
- https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150190834
Abstract
Since Helicoverpa armigera is a devastating pest, an attempt was made to separate its gut proteinases and assess their diversity. Gelatin coating present on the X-ray film was used as a substrate to detect electrophoretically separated proteinases of H. armigera gut extract on native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-PAGE and isoelectric focusing gels. The method involves electrophoresis, followed by washing the gel with Triton X-100 in case of SDS-PAGE, equilibration of the gel in proteinase assay buffers, overlaying the gel on X-ray film followed by washing the film with hot water to remove hydrolyzed gelatin revealing bands of proteinase activity. Using this protocol, at least six different proteinase isoforms were detected in H. armigera gut contents while three isoproteinases were identified in a commercial bacterial proteinase preparation. Adoption of the technique facilitated characterization of the H. armigera gut proteinases (HGP) and provided an easy tool to study the properties of the individual proteinases without purification. The approximate molecular masses of HGP as determined by SDS-PAGE were: 172.9, 59.3, 54.9, 47.6, 44.1 and 41.6 kDa, and of bacterial proteinases: 180.7, 127.3 and 95.3 kDa. The isoelectric point (pI) values of HGP and bacterial proteinase were in the range of 5.1–7.1 and 3.5–7.7, respectively. Some of the HGP isoforms were found to be highly pH-sensitive and showed activity only at pH 10.0. The major HGPs were inhibited by phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride but not by (4-amidinophenyl)-methanesulfonyl fluoride. Incubation of HGP-resolved electrophoretic gel strips in chickpea or winged bean proteinase inhibitor solution permitted identification of specific inhibitors of individual proteinases and revealed that the major HGPs were insensitive to chickpea inhibitors whereas winged bean inhibitors effectively inhibited all the HGPs. Our results suggest that considerable variability exists among the isoproteinases of H. armigera gut with respect to their pH optima and sensitivity towards chemical and plant proteinase inhibitors. Such diversity is of immense biological significance as it explains the polyphagous nature of the insect which imparts unique adaptability to it against the defensive proteinase inhibitors of its wide range of host plants.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resistance of plants to herbivorous insects: Can this resistance fail?Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 1996
- Combatting inhibitor-insensitive proteases of insect pestsTrends in Biotechnology, 1996
- Proteolytic Processing of Class IV Chitinase in the Compatible Interaction of Bean Roots with Fusarium solaniPlant Physiology, 1996
- Altered Protoxin Activation by Midgut Enzymes from a Bacillus thuringiensis Resistant Strain of Plodia interpunctellaBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1994
- Electrophoretic analysis of plant cysteine and serine proteinases using gelatin‐containing polyacrylamide gels and class‐specific proteinase inhibitorsElectrophoresis, 1993
- Diversity in digestive proteinase activity among insectsJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1990
- A novel mechanism of insect resistance engineered into tobaccoNature, 1987
- A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye bindingAnalytical Biochemistry, 1976
- Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4Nature, 1970
- DISC ELECTROPHORESIS – II METHOD AND APPLICATION TO HUMAN SERUM PROTEINS*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1964